01 / SECURITY
Know what the controls do.
Test selected command, path and tool policies against realistic scenarios. Keep unverified controls and limitations visible.
Claude Code rollout assurance
Adopt Claude Code with controls you can verify.
Give security and engineering teams a controlled path from trial to rollout. Test the guardrails in your environment and put evidence behind your risk decision.
For security, engineering and risk teams · Built by Trusec
endpoint · pre-tool-use hook
# agent attempts: $ rm -rf /var/data ⛔ DENY destructive command · control H-09 · blocked pre-execution $ cat ~/.aws/credentials ⛔ DENY protected credential path · control H-11 $ git status ✓ ALLOW read-only · evidence record written $
Illustration, not a customer result. Actual coverage is validated against the selected version and configuration.
Claude Codecurrent focus30-control cataloguecoverage assessed in scope30–45 daysindicative pilot window
The product demo
See Toren in action.
Follow a control decision, inspect the evidence and see how a scoped pilot supports your rollout.
Recorded demonstration using synthetic requests. Not a customer deployment.
Inspect an evidence example →Make the approval decision easier
Move the discussion from concerns to evidence.
AI coding adoption brings questions about command execution, sensitive data and accountability. A scoped pilot gives each owner something concrete to review.
02 / ENGINEERING
Understand the developer impact.
See permitted and denied actions, review legitimate exceptions and agree how the baseline fits your existing endpoint processes.
03 / RISK
Review a documented outcome.
Connect the agreed scope, control tests and observed results. Make the rollout decision with explicit gaps and ownership.
How it works
Enforce controls.
Validate coverage.
Support approval.
Toren combines managed settings, policy hooks and a structured validation approach for Claude Code.
- Configure the baseline for the agreed environment.
- Run tests and inspect the resulting decision records.
- Document coverage, exceptions and the rollout conditions.
Start with a scoped pilot
A defined engagement.
A decision you can act on.
Agree the environment and acceptance criteria before kickoff. Expand only after reviewing the results.
Claude Code assurance pilot
Indicative duration: 30–45 days, subject to agreed scope and readiness.
Fixed-scope pilotRequest a written quote
- Baseline and deployment planning
- Review the relevant control catalogue, configuration and customer endpoint-management approach.
- Control validation
- Agree the test scenarios, review observed behaviour and document controls that remain unverified.
- Evidence and risk-review handover
- Bring together test results, control references, evidence examples, gaps and residual risks.
- Rollout recommendation
- Review readiness with your stakeholders and identify the conditions for a wider rollout.
Agreed in your proposal: developer and endpoint numbers, OS and Claude Code version, deployment responsibilities, integrations, evidence handling, support, acceptance criteria and applicable taxes. Any ongoing-assurance scope or pilot credit is specified separately. Approval and certification are not guaranteed.
What is assessed
Technical controls, with their limits in view.
The catalogue includes technical controls and customer-owned processes. Each selected control needs validation in the target environment.
Command and path policies
Assess selected dangerous command patterns, protected files and managed permissions.
Tools and external access
Review MCP configuration, network boundaries and dependencies on customer infrastructure.
Evidence and change review
Inspect event records, agree retention and repeat validation before adopting material changes.
Before you commit
Clear answers for your buying team.
Which agents and endpoint environments are supported?
Claude Code is the current focus. We agree the OS, Claude Code version and endpoint-management approach during scoping, then validate that configuration. Other agents require a separate assessment; support for every OS or MDM is not implied.
Does the pilot guarantee a safe or compliant rollout?
No. It provides a documented assessment of the agreed controls and observed results, including gaps and residual risks. Your organisation retains responsibility for approval and compliance decisions. Read about compliance support.
What data is captured?
Evidence includes control decisions, references, hashes, redacted summaries and endpoint/session metadata, which can include hostnames and working directories. Redaction uses patterns and does not guarantee detection of every secret. Agree fields, access and retention before collecting customer evidence. Claude Code and model-provider data flows are assessed separately.
What happens when connectivity is lost?
Configured local hooks can evaluate policy without a central connection. Forwarding, remote dependencies and failure behaviour must be agreed and tested for the selected setup. Durable offline buffering and automatic delivery on reconnection are not promised.
What happens when Claude Code changes?
Re-run the agreed validation before widening adoption of a new version, model or configuration. Retest frequency and ongoing support are scoped separately; an untested version is not automatically covered.
What will we see in a demo?
A walkthrough of a control decision, its evidence record and how a scoped pilot can support your rollout review. Bring your current agent, endpoint environment and the decision you need to make. No production code or sensitive data is needed.
Take the next step
Bring your rollout question.
See the controls and evidence.
Start with a focused demo, then agree whether a pilot fits your environment and approval process.